Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Its a Drug-Full Life

Drug trafficking to society, is a crime, a sin. To another portion of the crowd, it’s easy money. Easy in a sense that you provide the drugs and you get paid. Drugs don’t come cheap, especially with the process involved in making it (waiting for a weed plant to grow doesn’t take a day or two) and the risks of legal action if caught. Once addicted, people are willing to pay any price to get hold of it.
Which is probably one of the reasons which makes women an easy target for drug lords. Most girls suffer from poor girl rich girl taste syndrome. To make ends meet, a regular job might suffice, but what about those other needs? The latest designer handbag? A new pair of shoes to match that gorgeous skirt? Lucrative promises like a week's paid vacation at a luxury resort in Jamaica, cash for clothing and toiletries before departure, spending money while there, and another check when you get home is not exactly something you can say no to. Even if the pre condition is traveling with a bag of Heroin and risking severe penalty if caught.
Most chances are, thoughts of the penalties don’t exactly cross their minds. Wealth clouds the ability to reason, apparently.

However, being a drug mule is not always by choice. It’s not always about wanting a Vera Wang gown for your wedding or a quick holiday in Belgium that leads you to easy money options like drug trafficking. There are those who are really trying to make ends meet, clothe and feed their children for instance. Some were forced into it, after being kidnapped. Some didn’t even suspect that they were drug mules until they were caught at the airport.
Such is the case as observed by Deputy Foreign Minister, A. Kohilan Pillay. According to him, about 70-80 percent of Malaysian drug mules detained in Latin American countries are women. Most of them were young and conned by the idea of winning travelling tickets but were carrying drugs in their luggage without even realizing it.
The fact that you get caught in a foreign country and are subject to the foreign country’s position on drug trafficking laws says enough. It all depends on your luck. If you land in Indonesia or Malaysia, say goodbye to your easy money and hello to hell. Otherwise would be said if you land in, say, Amsterdam. But it’s not strictly about the punishment. The process of waiting for the punishment to be executed, you’ll be stuck in prison. When has prison ever been a lovely bed of roses experience? You nor I am Lindsay Lohan. Prison is prison. Period. The experience is even worst when you’re in a foreign country where language and customs can be a barrier.

You can say that you had it coming, if you chose to be a drug mule. But what about unsuspecting victims?
This brings me to my current question, is it fair to impose a heavy punishment on these innocent beings? Sure there are legal defences you can rely on in court. But there is no guarantee of getting bailed out based on these defences. A lighter punishment perhaps, but hey, the psychological trauma of being in prison, being caught, I don’t know. Isn’t there something more we can do to help? And again, I’m not talking about drug mules by choice, but the ones who were forced into it.

-AJ-





Hilary Clinton's infamous 1995 speech, Women Rights are Human Rights

I would like to thank the Secretary General of the United Nations for inviting me to be part of the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. This is truly a celebration - a celebration of the contributions women make in every aspect of life: in the home, on the job, in their communities, as mothers, wives, sisters, daughters, learners, workers, citizens and leaders.

It is also a coming together, much the way women come together every day in every country.

We come together in fields and in factories. In village markets and supermarkets. In living rooms and board rooms.

Whether it is while playing with our children in the park, or washing clothes in a river, or taking a break at the office water cooler, we come together and talk about our aspirations and concerns. And time and again, our talk turns to our children and our families. However different we may be, there is far more that unites us than divides us. We share a common future. And we are here to find common ground so that we may help bring new dignity and respect to women and girls all over the world - and in so doing, bring new strength and stability to families as well.

By gathering in Beijing, we are focusing world attention on issues that matter most in the lives of women and their families: access to education, health care, jobs and credit, the chance to enjoy basic legal and human rights and participate fully in the political life of their countries.

There are some who question the reason for this conference.

Let them listen to the voices of women in their homes, neighborhoods, and workplaces.

There are some who wonder whether the lives of women and girls matter to economic and political progress around the globe.

Let them look at the women gathered here and at Huairou - the homemakers, nurses, teachers, lawyers, policymakers, and women who run their own businesses.

It is conferences like this that compel governments and people everywhere to listen, look and face the world's most pressing problems.

Wasn't it after the women's conference in Nairobi ten years ago that the world focused for the first time on the crisis of domestic violence?

Earlier today, I participated in a World Health Organization forum, where government officials, NGOs, and individual citizens are working on ways to address the health problems of women and girls.

Tomorrow, I will attend a gathering of the United Nations Development Fund for Women. There, the discussion will focus on local - and highly successful - programs that give hard-working women access to credit so they can improve their own lives and the lives of their families.

What we are learning around the world is that if women are healthy and educated, their families will flourish. If women are free from violence, their families will flourish. If women have a chance to work and earn as full and equal partners in society, their families will flourish.

And when families flourish, communities and nations will flourish.

That is why every woman, every man, every child, every family, and every nation on our planet has a stake in the discussion that takes place here.

Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children and families. Over the past two-and-a-half years, I have had the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my own country and around the world.

I have met new mothers in Jojakarta, Indonesia, who come together regularly in their village to discuss nutrition, family planning, and baby care.

I have met working parents in Denmark who talk about the comfort they feel in knowing that their children can be cared for in creative, safe, and nurturing after-school centers.

I have met women in South Africa who helped lead the struggle to end apartheid and are now helping build a new democracy.

I have met with the leading women of the Western Hemisphere who are working every day to promote literacy and better health care for the children of their countries.

I have met women in India and Bangladesh who are taking out small loans to buy milk cows, rickshaws, thread and other materials to create a livelihood for themselves and their families.

I have met doctors and nurses in Belarus and Ukraine who are trying to keep children alive in the aftermath of Chernobyl.

The great challenge of this Conference is to give voice to women everywhere whose experiences go unnoticed, whose words go unheard.

Women comprise more than half the world's population. Women are 70% percent of the world's poor, and two-thirds of those who are not taught to read and write.

Women are the primary caretakers for most of the world's children and elderly. Yet much of the work we do is not valued - not by economists, not by historians, not by popular culture, not by government leaders.

At this very moment, as we sit here, women around the world are giving birth, raising children, cooking meals, washing clothes, cleaning houses, planting crops, working on assembly lines, running companies, and running countries.

Women also are dying from diseases that should have been prevented or treated; they are watching their children succumb to malnutrition caused by poverty and economic deprivation; they are being denied the right to go to school by their own fathers and brothers; they are being forced into prostitution, and they are being barred from the bank lending office and banned from the ballot box.

Those of us who have the opportunity to be here have the responsibility to speak for those who could not.

As an American, I want to speak up for women in my own country - women who are raising children on the minimum wage, women who can't afford health care or child care, women whose lives are threatened by violence, including violence in their own homes.

I want to speak up for mothers who are fighting for good schools, safe neighborhoods, clean air and clean airwaves; for older women, some of them widows, who have raised their families and now find that their skills and life experiences are not valued in the workplace; for women who are working all night as nurses, hotel clerks, and fast food cooks so that they can be at home during the day with their kids; and for women everywhere who simply don't have time to do everything they are called upon to do each day.

Speaking to you today, I speak for them, just as each of us speaks for women around the world who are denied the chance to go to school, or see a doctor, or own property, or have a say about the direction of their lives, simply because they are women. The truth is that most women around the world work both inside and outside the home, usually by necessity.

We need to understand that there is no formula for how women should lead their lives. That is why we must respect the choices that each woman makes for herself and her family. Every woman deserves the chance to realize her God-given potential.

We also must recognize that women will never gain full dignity until their human rights are respected and protected.

Our goals for this Conference, to strengthen families and societies by empowering women to take greater control over their own destinies, cannot be fully achieved unless all governments - here and around the world - accept their responsibility to protect and promote internationally recognized human rights.

The international community has long acknowledged - and recently affirmed at Vienna - that both women and men are entitled to a range of protections and personal freedoms, from the right of personal security to the right to determine freely the number and spacing of the children they bear.

No one should be forced to remain silent for fear of religious or political persecution, arrest, abuse or torture.

Tragically, women are most often the ones whose human rights are violated.

Even in the late 20th century, the rape of women continues to be used as an instrument of armed conflict. Women and children make up a large majority of the world's refugees. When women are excluded from the political process, they become even more vulnerable to abuse.

I believe that, on the eve of a new millennium, it is time to break our silence. It is time for us to say here in Beijing, and the world to hear, that it is no longer acceptable to discuss women's rights as separate from human rights.

These abuses have continued because, for too long, the history of women has been a history of silence. Even today, there are those who are trying to silence our words.

The voices of this conference and of the women at Huairou must be heard loud and clear: It is a violation of human rights when babies are denied food, or drowned, or suffocated, or their spines broken, simply because they are born girls.

It is a violation of human rights when women and girls are sold into the slavery of prostitution.

It is a violation of human rights when women are doused with gasoline, set on fire and burned to death because their marriage dowries are deemed too small.

It is a violation of human rights when individual women are raped in their own communities and when thousands of women are subjected to rape as a tactic or prize of war.

It is a violation of human rights when a leading cause of death worldwide among women ages 14 to 44 is the violence they are subjected to in their own homes.

It is a violation of human rights when young girls are brutalized by the painful and degrading practice of genital mutilation.

It is a violation of human rights when women are denied the right to plan their own families, and that includes being forced to have abortions or being sterilized against their will.

If there is one message that echoes forth from this conference, it is that human rights are women's rights - and women's rights are human rights. Let us not forget that among those rights are the right to speak freely - and the right to be heard.

Women must enjoy the right to participate fully in the social and political lives of their countries if we want freedom and democracy to thrive and endure.

It is indefensible that many women in nongovernmental organizations who wished to participate in this conference have not been able to attend - or have been prohibited from fully taking part.

Let me be clear. Freedom means the right of people to assemble, organize, and debate openly. It means respecting the views of those who may disagree with the views of their governments. It means not taking citizens away from their loved ones and jailing them, mistreating them, or denying them their freedom or dignity because of the peaceful expression of their ideas and opinions.

In my country, we recently celebrated the 75th anniversary of women's suffrage. It took 150 years after the signing of our Declaration of Independence for women to win the right to vote.

It took 72 years of organized struggle on the part of many courageous women and men. It was one of America's most divisive philosophical wars. But it was also a bloodless war. Suffrage was achieved without a shot being fired.

We have also been reminded, in V-1 Day observances last weekend, of the good that comes when men and women join together to combat the forces of tyranny and build a better world.

We have seen peace prevail in most places for a half century. We have avoided another world war.

But we have not solved older, deeply-rooted problems that continue to diminish the potential of half the world's population.

Now it is time to act on behalf of women everywhere. If we take bold steps to better the lives of women, we will be taking bold steps to better the lives of children and families too.

Families rely on mothers and wives for emotional support and care; families rely on women for labor in the home; and increasingly, families rely on women for income needed to raise healthy children and care for other relatives.

As long as discrimination and inequities remain so commonplace around the world - as long as girls and women are valued less, fed less, fed last, overworked, underpaid, not schooled and subjected to violence in and out of their homes - the potential of the human family to create a peaceful, prosperous world will not be realized.

Let this Conference be our - and the world's - call to action.

And let us heed the call so that we can create a world in which every woman is treated with respect and dignity, every boy and girl is loved and cared for equally, and every family has the hope of a strong and stable future.

Thank you very much

Sunday, September 5, 2010

Racial Crisis

IF YOU HAVE YET TO READ THIS, CHECK IT OUT.
http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/note.php?note_id=432073840741&id=586500176&ref=mf

Is this how one celebrates Independence Day? Every time you scream, "Merdeka!", are racist thoughts burning in your head?
Flip through your history books, recall 13th May 1969. Remember the racial crisis that nearly brought this country to ruins? The only reason we achieved Merdeka or Independance is because we united, not just because we had good leaders.
Race is nothing but your ethnicity, what you were born with. That thing in your identification card. It doesn't determine who you are. Stereotypes are not a hundred percent true. What more if you look more carefully.

Think about it. Do you really want to return to an era where everthing was chaotic? Where we had no sense of identity? No freedom?

Open your mind. Satu Malaysia is a cause, a breakthrough. Living in a multiracial country was never easy but we made it. Why stop now?
SATU MALAYSIA anyone?

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Abandoned Babies- Who's to blame?

Day in day out we've been bombarded with front page news regarding innocent babies being abandoned near dumpsters. The rare yet still existent human part of us tear up at this sight. Who knew that such a cruel and animalistic act could still occur in these days of globalization? We scream of development but truth be the matter we're still acting like apes. No, forgive me, that would be an insult to apes. Even apes care for their newborns which of course I can't say the same for man.


Who is to blame in this situation?
The lack of sex education?
Maybe condoms and the morning after pill should be given away for free, so everyone can afford it and illegitimate children wouldn't be an issue
No, maybe the problem is our censorship boards aren't working. Malaysia should ban ANYTHING close to porn
Or or.. everyone should be forced to wear a chastity belt. Whoever fails to do so will be fined or imprisoned.

What's your say? Obviously it's not the babies' fault. Blame it on the parents, the government, everyone you can blame.
But apart from playing the blame game, let's think. How do we stop this montrosity?

Monday, February 8, 2010

International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law: A Future Conundrum?

I was just at a Lecture on International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law: Distinction and Compatibility given by the Director of the Qatar Red Crescent. It was somewhat interesting.

But I couldn't help but wonder, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Palestinian Wall Case (or hey, Israeli Wall Case if that's your P.O.V.) had stated that International Humanitarian Law (IHL) is the lex specialis during times of armed conflict and that International Human Rights Law (the general law applicable during times of peace) is to be interpreted in light of IHL.

It got me thinking. International Human Rights Law (IHRL) is constantly evolving and developing where as IHL is constantly staying at the bare minimum. How can IHRL still be interpreted in the future in light of IHL if one maintains the minimum and another is ever developing?

What is the next step of evolution for IHL? History shows that it would actually take a disaster of epic proportions for IHL to developed. Heck it took World War II for the Geneva Conventions to be properly codified.


So what do you think? Voice your thoughts and ideas please.

Isyam out.

Sunday, January 3, 2010

International Child Abduction


It's been a while, but I'm pretty sure every one can sort of recall the whole child abduction case that hit our shores (Malaysia, not Miami). It was a custody battle between Malaysian, Elis Syuhaila Mokhtar and Belgian, Frank Van de Ven (one of not so good looking Dutch men I've seen throughout my life).
Moving on, Elis was already granted custody rights by the Shariah Court. However, Frank (intelligently or stupidly, I can not decide here) took the child, Ferris, under the pretext of visitation rights and out for a holiday but managed to disappear out of the country- with the child.
Even more miraculously, Ferris' passport was with the mother.
Which brings me to the question, how dependable is the Hague Convention in protecting custody rights?
Well it is pretty dependable, but look at what's going on now.
Maybe Elis should have asked for a ne exeat writ. Frank wouldn't be able to escape as he's prevented from leaving the country.
Unfortunately, most of us are not educated in international marriages, our rights if (God forbid) anything goes wrong..
With globalization and very good looking Dutch guys, international marriages are definitely on the rise and one must educate oneself and do all in one's efforts to protect one's rights (if say the marriage ends and for your custody rights)
Even if you're not getting married to a foreign national, it could be a friend or a close relative.
I'm not here to condemn international marriages, in fact I support it.
But by all means, one must always take precaution as to their legal rights.
Just a little thought that crossed the mind.. =)

Monday, December 21, 2009

Baby Factories.. a noble cause???


There was an article in The Star on the busting of the syndicate which practically deals with babies!* One will inevitably ponder on how it is actually done! for the unitiated, baby 'factories' are just that: syndicates that actually produce and harvest babies for sale to parents in need of babies!

How this is done is rather simple. The syndicate itself is a family-run business, and couples desperate to have children but are somehow unable to will seek their help. the business will then have groups of employees, usually immigrants from indonesia or some other country, lured by the prospects of cash, and will therefore allow the husbands of the families to consummate with the employees, who will then bear the babies which shall therefore be sold to the parents. the employees will also get commission for their work done in bearing the babies.

Yes, on first glance i agree with almost anyone out there that this is such a despicable act that would rile up anyone who reads it. Especially since the parents are charged rather exorbitant rates, and the employees were lied to and given extremely low rates for the services offered. It somehow defiles the sacred act of childbearing and is a wanton disregard for the services offered by the employees, who risk their life bearing a baby they will most probably never see anymore in their lives.

But i implore all of you to open your minds and broaden your views on this matter. Sure i agree that the involvement and abuse of money in the process is what taints this 'business', but in truth, it does seem like a noble cause, doesnt it? (i am strictly speaking on the basis of the essence of what they do, not how they do it)

Firstly, they are actually offering an alternative to laboratory means of procreation. What i mean is that it is still somewhat similar to In-Vitro Fertilization, or test-tube babies, whereby a third party helps in the creation of the baby, but you will not have to deal with the stigma that the baby you have with you was actually created by doctors or some rather artificial means; it is all natural!

Secondly, instead of adoption, which is still something that goes on till this very day, parents who resort to this method might have the view that it is done so that the child will still have an inkling of the parents blood, albeit only one of the supposed two of them. So there would still be a bloodline to carry on and pass down, even though it is not perfect per se, as compared to an adopted child, who usually has no blood ties to the parents at all (unless they adopt a child of a relative, that is).

Thirdly, it would most probably still be cheaper and more confidential than resorting to hospitals like the private sector, might cost an arm and leg, whilst in the public sector, it has its own flaws. With this business, the cost of the baby is around RM 10,000 to RM 20,000, and there are no questions asked or no forms to fill at all, which would most probably help them with their confidentiality. This is opposed to hospitals, with the endless form-filling and procedures that have to be followed. In short, it is a no-frills procedure of getting a child!

So all in all, on a basic level, if we were to take out the whole cost and financial factor, i actually opine that it is a rather noble thing to do. But yes, if we put in the element of religion, we know that it is still something that is looked down upon, especially since the husband has to physically perform the sexual act with the employee to conceive the baby. This, in a way, is akin to zina, and one would just have said that the husband should have just married another.

But in the end, i do agree that it is still a very tightly wound issue, and these are merely opinions of my own. It would be great to hear opinions from all of you who read this post. What say you? Do you agree with me/disagree/agree to disagree? Bring forth some points of your own to broaden the whole view of this matter, so we might come to a conclusive opinion together :)


Happy reading and pondering!
EzzE

*Actual article can be read here - http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/12/16/nation/5311476&sec=nation